大腕

前 Rockstar 开发者称 GTA6 泄密事件“不值一提”，坚称“热咖啡”事件要严重得多_我的网站

一 |     

    Screenshot from video obtained by the Global Times on July 21, 2026 shows the transfer of injured Philippine personnel near Ren'ai Jiao, which was overseen and assisted by the China Coast Guard. Photo: Courtesy of the China Coast GuardThe Philippine military side has again claimed that resupplying its grounded warship at Ren'ai Jiao needs no foreign approval and resupply there is within its self-claimed so-called EEZ, while Philippine media acknowledged that 15 "safe" resupply missions were made over the past two years under a China-Philippines provisional arrangement. 
Chinese experts warned on Wednesday that Manila should not mistake humanitarian accommodation for a concession and must bear the consequences if it scraps the arrangement.
Yang Xiao, a research fellow at the Institute of Peaceful Development under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Wednesday that the Philippine side's claims are fundamentally flawed from legal, historical and practical perspectives. 
Ren'ai Jiao is an inherent part of China's Nansha Qundao, over which China has indisputable and complete sovereignty, Yang said, adding that it is legally untenable for the Philippines to claim that Ren'ai Jiao is part of its exclusive economic zone.
"The Philippines deliberately grounded the abandoned warship at Ren'ai Jiao in 1999 and repeatedly pledged to remove it and restore the reef, but has failed to honor those commitments for more than two decades. This itself constitutes a continuing violation of China's territorial sovereignty," Yang said. 
This is not the first time the Philippines has denied seeking China's approval for resupply missions to Ren'ai Jiao. In April 2025, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun responded to similar claims, saying that China's position on how to handle the current situation at Ren'ai Jiao is clear and consistent.
"First, by keeping its warship grounded at Ren'ai Jiao for decades running, the Philippines has been violating China's sovereignty and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). We demand that the Philippines tow away the warship. Second, between now and when the warship is towed away, should the Philippines need to send living necessities, China is willing to allow it in a humanitarian spirit if the Philippines informs China in advance and after on-site verification is conducted. Third, if the Philippines were to send large amount of construction materials to the warship and attempt to build fixed facilities or permanent outpost, China will absolutely not accept it and will resolutely stop it in accordance with the law and regulations," said the spokesperson.
"This means that the Philippines' so-called '15 safe and incident-free resupply missions' were all made possible by China's humanitarian accommodation and strict oversight," Yang stressed. Each mission was reported in advance and allowed to proceed only after inspections confirmed no prohibited construction materials were aboard. The CCG intercepted any such materials through lawful measures, Yang said.
The Philippines' unilateral denial of its notification and inspection obligations while enjoying the arrangement's benefits amounts to a blatant breach of its commitments, the expert noted.
Yang also noted that Manila's narrative contains an obvious logical contradiction. If Philippine resupply missions were truly unimpeded, there would be no need for Manila to repeatedly claim that China had "blocked" its missions and call for international intervention. Yet if China had continuously "obstructed" the missions, the Philippines could not have completed 15 safe and incident-free resupply operations. 
"Manila has simply manipulated its narrative to suit its publicity needs, portraying itself as a 'victim' when seeking international attention while touting smooth resupply operations and its own strength when seeking to project toughness. Its hype over the 15 resupply missions is essentially aimed at rallying domestic support and stoking confrontation internationally to conceal the reality that its illegal presence is tightly constrained," Yang said.
China's handling of the Ren'ai Jiao situation, meanwhile, has consistently reflected restraint and humanitarian considerations. According to a statement by the China Coast Guard (CCG) spokesperson on the transfer of injured personnel by the Philippine side, Jiang Lue, a CCG spokesperson, said that on the morning of July 21, out of humanitarian considerations, China allowed the Philippines to transfer injured personnel by small boats from the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57), which has been illegally grounded at Ren'ai Jiao, to Philippine Coast Guard vessel 9702. The CCG questioned and verified the Philippine vessels and monitored the entire process.
The CCG will continue to carry out rights-protection and law enforcement operations in accordance with the law in the waters around Ren'ai Jiao to safeguard China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, Jiang said.
Yang said, stressing that Manila's tough talk and one-sided claims cannot make up for its legal and moral shortcomings.
"Any attempt to permanently occupy Chinese islands and reefs, unilaterally tear up the understanding and continuously challenge China's territorial sovereignty runs counter to international law and the broader trend toward peace and development in the region and is ultimately doomed to fail," Yang added.
。

二 |     随着 Take-Two 努力确认 GTA6 “CyberLeek” 账号背后的个人或团体，一位前 Rockstar 开发者坚称，最近接连发生的游戏演示泄露事件对游戏本身的成功几乎没有影响。在短短六天内，CyberLeek 发布了 10 段 GTA6 游戏演示视频和一张完整地图的图片，引发了对相关负责人的搜捕。Rockstar 母公司 Take-Two 已向微软、Discord 甚至 X 发出传票，但泄密者似乎并不畏惧，甚至还在进行一项由加密货币驱动的投票，以决定接下来发布哪段视频。

三 | 而这一切都发生在 Netflix 限时独占揭晓 GTA6 的一周前，届时该游戏将首次正式全面亮相。从 Take-Two 和 Rockstar 的角度来看，泄露造成了重大损失。据报道，Rockstar 仍然不知道这些泄露是如何发生的，也不知道幕后黑手是谁。虽然目前没有计划推迟本周在 Netflix 上的重大揭晓，但据报道内部对最近的事件感到沮丧和愤怒，管理层正在向员工发送鼓舞士气的邮件。然而，前 Rockstar Games 技术总监 Obbe Vermeij 淡化了泄露造成的损害。Vermeij 曾于 1995 年至 2009 年在 Rockstar North 工作，他在社交媒体上表示，“热咖啡”丑闻比这些 GTA6 泄露事件的破坏性要大得多。“大家冷静点。这些泄露没什么大不了的，”Vermeij 开篇说道。

四 | “作为一种营销策略，Rockstar 试图比其他发行商更久地保持游戏的神秘感。所发生的一切只是一些片段流出了。

五 | 就在下周 Netflix 活动的前夕。”“90% 的未来玩家不会花时间在网上寻找视频片段。他们没有时间，也不想被剧透。”“我能想象团队对此有点烦恼，但也就仅此而已。

六 | ‘热咖啡’事件期间我也在场。那对管理层（Rockstar 纽约）来说是一场噩梦，但对我们（Rockstar North）影响不大。目前的泄露后果远不如‘热咖啡’严重。”“看起来 GTA6 将会是现象级的，并且能在未来 15 年左右持续热销。

七 | 泄露只是一个小插曲。”“热咖啡”丑闻是 2005 年的一场争议，涉及 Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas – The Definitive Edition 中隐藏的露骨性爱小游戏。模组制作者发现游戏光盘上留下的未完成代码允许玩家解锁粗糙的互动性爱场景，引发了政治愤怒、暂时的“仅限成人”分级，以及 Rockstar Games 数百万美元的和解金。“不，那是真的受伤了，”Vermeij 在谈到“热咖啡”时说。“这款游戏不得不从美国的商店下架。在版本更新准备好之前，它只能作为 18+ 游戏销售。估计损失了 5000 万美元，这在当时对 Rockstar/Take-Two 来说是一大笔钱。”Rockstar 联合创始人 Dan Houser 在去年 10 月接受采访时表示，公司“因为‘热咖啡’事件几度濒临崩溃”，并补充道：“那极其艰难。”人们越来越担心 CyberLeek 可能会通过发布关键剧情过场动画来剧透 GTA6 的故事。

八 | 到目前为止还没有发生这种情况，但即使发生了，Vermeij 也淡化了其影响。

九 | “那会很糟糕，但人们仍然会玩它，”他说。根据泄露中显示的一些游戏画面，还有推测认为 CyberLeek 拥有一个可运行的 GTA6 开发版本。“如果真是这样，它可能只在开发机上运行，”Vermeij 坚称。“开发机有更大的内存。

十 | 目前可能不存在能在零售版 PS5 上运行的版本。”GTA6 有望成为史上规模最大的娱乐产品首发，创下销售和收入记录。正如 Vermeij 所说，游戏演示泄露不太可能威胁到该游戏 11 月发布的成功。但它们仍然是 Take-Two 和 Rockstar 面临的一次重大安全漏洞，无疑会影响那些花费多年时间开发游戏的员工士气。它们还可能削弱 Netflix 限时独占揭晓的影响力，想必 Netflix 对现状也不会感到高兴。Take-Two 和 Rockstar 均未就 GTA6 泄露事件发表声明。

Current article:http://d466z.cuiguagonggengaotianwan.shop/news/20260826_7183338.html

Published on:09:44:45